Toggle Menu

What does being a whistleblower look like?

Learn about 5 critical steps in the whistleblower process – and how we can protect and help you each step of the way!

I suspect fraud – Let’s chat


100% free & confidential

Qui Tam Lawsuit: The Whistleblower Process

You think you have seen something that isn’t right. Whether it’s systematic overbilling on a government contract, a healthcare provider charging Medicare for services never performed, or a defense contractor supplying substandard parts, you suspect you have witnessed fraud against the U.S. government. Now you face a difficult question: What do you do next?

Standing up against fraud is a courageous and patriotic act. It protects American taxpayers and helps hold powerful entities accountable. The primary legal tool for a private citizen to do this is the federal False Claims Act (FCA), a law that dates back to the Civil War, when it was nicknamed the “Lincoln Law.”

The FCA allows a private individual with knowledge of fraud — known as a “relator” or whistleblower — to file a lawsuit on behalf of the United States government. This type of lawsuit is called a qui tam action. If the lawsuit is successful, the government recovers stolen funds, and the relator can receive a substantial reward for their courage and assistance.

The whistleblower process is not a simple one. It is a highly complex legal journey with unique procedures, timelines, and risks that an attorney who knows whistleblower law can help you navigate.

Key Takeaways

  • A qui tam lawsuit allows a private citizen, or “relator,” to sue on behalf of the U.S. government for fraud under the False Claims Act (FCA).
  • FCA lawsuits are filed “under seal,” meaning they are filed in secret to protect the relator and allow the government to investigate the allegations confidentially.
  • The Department of Justice investigates the claims and decides whether to “intervene” and lead the case or decline, letting the relator proceed privately if they choose.
  • If a case is successful, the relator is eligible to receive a potential reward, a percentage of the total funds recovered by the government.
  • The FCA includes anti-retaliation provisions that offer legal protections for employees and others who report fraud against the government.

Step 1: The confidential consultation and case evaluation

Whistleblower Steps

 

The very first step in the whistleblower process is to seek a confidential discussion with an attorney experienced in whistleblower law. This initial conversation is one of the most critical stages of the entire process. At Carolina Whistleblower Attorneys, this is a free and 100% confidential conversation where you can share your suspicions and learn your options in secret without obligation.

Your role:

Your responsibility during this initial meeting is to be as detailed and honest as possible. Before the call, it can be helpful to organize your thoughts and any evidence you may have. Consider creating a timeline of events, noting who was involved, what fraudulent actions you observed, and when they occurred.

Caution Icon

Important Note: Do not attempt to conduct your own investigation or gather additional documents you don’t already have legitimate access to. Doing so could alert the company to your activities and potentially put you in legal jeopardy. Bring what you know and what you lawfully possess, and let your legal team guide you on the next steps.

The attorney’s role:

An experienced whistleblower attorney can listen carefully to your story. They will ask specific questions designed to determine if the facts you present could form the basis of a successful False Claims Act case. They will be evaluating several key elements:

  • Is it fraud? Does the conduct you describe meet the legal definition of fraud under the FCA? This could include submitting false claims for payment, knowingly using false records, or wrongfully avoiding an obligation to pay money back to the government.Non-Public first to file banner.
  • Is the information non-public? A key requirement of the FCA is the “first-to-file” rule. Anyone has the right to report fraud through a whistleblower (qui tam) lawsuit as long as the information they provide is original, not previously known, and not known to the public.
  • Is there sufficient evidence? What proof exists to support the allegations? This can include emails, internal reports, billing records, witness testimony, or other documentation.
  • What is the scale of the fraud? The government is more likely to be interested in cases involving a significant financial loss. An attorney can help analyze the potential damages.

At the end of this step, the attorney will be able to give you their candid assessment. Our team can help you weigh the pros and cons of moving forward, discuss the realities of the process, and explain the legal protections available to you.

Step 2: Building the case — The disclosure statement and filing

If you and your legal team agree that you have a strong case and you decide to move forward, the next phase begins: building the formal case to present to the government. This is not just a matter of filing a lawsuit; it requires preparing a comprehensive package of evidence and information.

The three parts of the "You-first" contingency fee.At this stage, you may choose to officially retain our team, typically on a contingency fee basis. This means you will pay no fees unless we obtain a financial recovery for you.² Our fee is a percentage of any reward we achieve on your behalf.

The central document you and your attorneys will create is the Relator’s Disclosure Statement. This is a detailed, written narrative that lays out the entire fraud scheme. It’s essentially the story of the case, supported by all available evidence. It typically includes:

  • A detailed description of the fraudulent activities
  • The names of the companies and individuals involved
  • The specific government programs affected (e.g., Medicare, Medicaid, Department of Defense contracts)
  • An explanation of how you obtained your information
  • Copies of all supporting documents, such as fraudulent invoices, revealing emails, internal memos, and financial records

The goal is to create a compelling and well-documented “roadmap” for government investigators. The more thorough and organized this statement is, the more likely the government will be to take the case seriously.

Step 3: Filing the lawsuit “under seal”

Once the Disclosure Statement and the formal legal complaint are prepared, your attorneys will file your Complaint with the Court. This is where a critical feature of the False Claims Act comes into play: the lawsuit is filed “under seal.”

What does “under seal” mean?

  • Filed under seal bannerIt is secret. When the government begins their investigation, the company you are accusing of fraud (the defendant) will not be notified that you’ve come forward.
  • It protects your identity. The seal is designed to protect you from premature exposure and potential retaliation from your employer or others involved in the fraud.
  • It gives the government time to investigate. This secrecy provides the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) with a crucial window to conduct its own investigation without the defendant knowing they are under scrutiny. They can gather evidence, interview witnesses, and build their case while reducing the risk of documents being destroyed or stories being changed.

The qui tam case must legally remain under seal for at least 60 days, with your identity remaining anonymous, while the government conducts its investigation. 

During this time, it is imperative that you maintain absolute confidentiality. Do not discuss the case with anyone other than your attorneys.

Step 4: The government investigation

While the case is under seal, the DOJ, often in conjunction with other federal agencies like the FBI or the Office of Inspector General for Health and Human Services (HHS-OIG), will conduct a thorough investigation into your allegations.

Your Disclosure Statement and evidence serve as their starting point. They may:

  • Interview you: Government attorneys and investigators will want to speak with you in-depth, often multiple times, to fully understand the facts of the case.
  • Request documents: The government has powerful tools at its disposal. They can issue Civil Investigative Demands (CIDs) or other document requests to the defendants to compel them to produce documents, data, and witness testimony.
  • Interview other witnesses: They may interview current and former employees of the company and other individuals who may have knowledge of the fraud.
  • Consult experts: They may bring in financial analysts, medical billing experts, or industry specialists to analyze the evidence and calculate the total financial harm to the government.

Your role during this phase is to cooperate fully and truthfully with the government’s investigation. Your continued assistance and credibility are vital. The extent and quality of your cooperation can also be a factor in determining the percentage of the reward you ultimately may receive.

Step 5: The government’s decision — Intervention or declination

After its investigation is complete, the government faces a critical decision. It must choose whether to intervene in the case or decline to intervene. This decision is a major turning point in the lawsuit.

If the government intervenes:

Intervention means the government will have primary control over the case while you and your attorney participate as needed. This is generally a very positive development. It means the full weight and resources of the United States are now behind the case.

  • The case is “unsealed” and becomes public record.
  • The defendant is officially served with the lawsuit and must respond.
  • The DOJ’s attorneys take the lead in litigating the case, though you and your attorneys remain involved and continue to assist.

Most intervened cases are resolved through a settlement, but the government is fully prepared to take the case to trial if necessary. If the case is successful after intervention, the relator is generally eligible for a reward of 15% to 25% of the total amount recovered by the government.

If the government declines:

Declination means the government has chosen not to take over the case. This does not necessarily mean your case is weak. The government declines cases for many reasons — limited resources, a case that is too small for them to pursue, or a strategic decision to focus on other matters.

If the government declines, you and your attorneys have a choice. You have the right to proceed with the lawsuit on your own, litigating the case privately on behalf of the government. This is a significant undertaking that requires a lawyer. At Carolina Whistleblower Attorneys, we have the financial resources, experience, and resolve to go toe-to-toe with a well-funded corporate defendant.

If you choose to proceed and are successful, your potential reward is higher to compensate for the additional risk and effort. A relator in a successful declined case is generally eligible for a reward of 25% to 30% of the government’s recovery.

types of rewards for speaking up in a successful whistleblower case graphic

Step 6: Resolution, potential rewards, and retaliation protections

The final step is the resolution of the case, which can happen through a settlement or a trial verdict. The vast majority of resolved False Claims Act cases end in a settlement, where the defendant agrees to pay a certain amount to resolve the allegations.

Your possible reward:

If the case is successful, your legal team will negotiate with the government to determine your “relator’s share,” or the percentage of the recovery you can receive as a potential reward. This amount is based on several factors, including the significance of your information, the quality of your assistance to the government, and whether the government intervened. These rewards can be substantial, often reaching millions of dollars.

But the reward is more than just financial. By coming forward, you have played a heroic role in helping stop corporate greed, protect vital government programs, and possibly recover taxpayer money that was stolen from the public.

Protections against retaliation:

The False Claims Act contains powerful anti-retaliation provisions. If your employer fires, demotes, harasses, or otherwise discriminates against you because of your lawful acts in furtherance of an FCA case, you may be able to file a separate claim for relief. This can include:

  • Reinstatement to your job
  • Two times the amount of back pay you lost
  • Compensation for other damages you suffered due to the retaliation

These protections are designed to help you avoid having to choose between your job and doing the right thing

Consult a trusted Carolina Whistleblower Attorney

The whistleblower process is complex, and the stakes are high. It requires courage to come forward and an experienced advocate to guide you. If you have witnessed fraud against the government, you don’t have to figure it out alone.

Carolina Whistleblower Attorneys is led by a former U.S. Attorney who helped lead the nation on whistleblower recoveries, giving us invaluable insight into how the government evaluates and pursues these critical cases.1,4 Our team has the vast resources and experience to invest in your case and stand up to powerful opponents.

You have the power to help hold wrongdoers accountable. We have the experience to help you every step of the way. Contact Carolina Whistleblower Attorneys today at 1-888-292-8852 or through our online form for a free, 100% confidential case evaluation. We can help you understand your rights, your protections, and the path forward.

Awards we’ve won

For standards of inclusion for awards listed, visit bestlawyers.com, thenationaltriallawyers.org, superlawyers.com, farrin.com/business-nc-power-list, and millondollaradvocates.com. National Trial Lawyers Top 100 designation is for 2025. Regarding the Million Dollar Advocates Forum, we do not represent that similar results will be achieved in your case. Each case is different and must be evaluated separately. Firm award is for the Law Offices of James Scott Farrin. Attorney awards are for attorneys with the Law Offices of James Scott Farrin.

Contact the Carolina
Whistleblower Attorneys

If you’re wondering if it’s a good idea to speak with a whistleblower lawyer about what you know, let us set the record straight.

  • Corporate ethics hotlines can be risky and may lead to termination. If you’ve already done this, call us immediately.
  • Your coworkers could be aware of the fraud – or complicit in it – and you should not talk to them about it.
  • The first claim to be filed under the False Claims Act can proceed – if you’re not first, you’re at a serious disadvantage and may get nothing (another reason not to speak to your coworkers about it).
  • A confidential discussion costs you a few minutes, but could save you time, stress, and money.

1-888-292-8852

"*" indicates required fields

* Denotes required

Disclaimer: Submission of any information to CarolinaWhistleblower.com does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. We have attorneys licensed to practice law in North and South Carolina.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.